Mel Gibson explains why it took so lengthy to make a sequel to The Ardour of the Christ. Launched in 2004, Gibson’s epic biblical drama, primarily based on the New Testomony, tells the story of Christ’s crucifixion, starring Jim Caviezel as Jesus, Monica Bellucci as Magdalen, and Maia Morgenstern as Mary, amongst others. Not too long ago, it was introduced that the filmmaker has teamed up with Lionsgate on a long-awaited sequel, with filming anticipated to start out in the summertime.

In a panel with ScreenRant’s Joe Deckelmeier at Fan Expo Philadelphia, Gibson shared the explanation behind the look ahead to a sequel, The Resurrection of Christ. The filmmaker revealed that the script alone took him “eight years” to write down due to the complexity of the topic and it being “almost impossible” to grasp. He additionally teased that the consequence was two motion pictures as a substitute of 1. Learn his remark beneath:

It took me about eight years to write down the script for the sequel, if we are able to name that The Resurrection of Christ, as a result of it is a very complicated and nearly unattainable to grasp topic, in order that essentially it’s important to underpin it with a substantial amount of all of salvation historical past and theology.

It was a really tough factor to search out and synthesize, as a result of it’s important to perceive, firstly, why it issues… You must suppose, why is mankind so essential on this course of? Why are the massive realms of fine and evil slugging it up for the hearts and minds and souls of mankind? Why us? We’re only a bunch of f***ed up issues. We’re imperfect. You must ask your self, why are we essential? Why are we making the sandwich? That complete large story. And I feel with a purpose to perceive that, it’s important to, it’s important to begin with the autumn of the angels within the firmament, earlier than proper in the beginning, is fairly loopy concept, what did that appear to be? I do know what it seems like. It’s not one movie, it’s two movies, as a result of it’s huge.

What This Means For The Resurrection Of Christ

The Resurrection Of Christ Is An Epic Biblical Dialog

Eight years in the past, Gibson teased that he had begun engaged on a sequel to The Ardour of the Christ. Again then, he defined that his film does not inform the occasion of Christ’s resurrection in a chronological method, however somewhat the importance, historical past, and that means behind it and all the things that occurred round it. He additionally teased that the unhealthy guys within the upcoming motion pictures could be in one other realm.

Associated

Controversial Mel Gibson Film That Made $612 Million Turns into World Netflix Hit 21 Years Later

A controversial Mel Gibson film that however grossed greater than $600 million worldwide turns into a worldwide Netflix hit 20 years later.

The director affords a glimpse into the philosophical side of the upcoming film and its dialogue of the theology of salvation. Gibson funded the manufacturing and advertising and marketing prices himself whereas making the 2004 biblical drama, which makes The Ardour of Christ and its sequel a really private challenge. Plainly the eight years that he spent on the script weren’t as a result of any monetary or exterior obstacles, however have been the size of the inventive course of.

Whereas Lionsgate is partnering with Gibson on the sequel, it is nonetheless unclear if the studio greenlighted the challenge with two motion pictures in thoughts.

As well as, Gibson is seemingly confirming that The Resurrection of Christ could possibly be cut up into two motion pictures. This isn’t the primary time that this has been speculated, as Caviezel himself hinted about it again in July 2023. He stated, “It will be the biggest film in history. It might be two films. Could be three, but I think it’s two.” Whereas Lionsgate is partnering with Gibson on the sequel, it is nonetheless unclear if the studio greenlighted the challenge with two motion pictures in thoughts. Nevertheless, it would not be shocking if that’s the case, contemplating the unique film turned an enormous field workplace hit with $612 million.

Our Take On The Resurrection Of Christ

Mel Gibson’s New Film Has Already Set Itself Aside

Gibson’s distinctive strategy to biblical drama shines by means of within the 2004 film. Regardless of Ardour of the Christ attracting some degree of controversy, the movie is thought for its vivid depiction of Jesus’ struggling, which units it aside from different movies that deal with the identical topic. It feels like the subsequent film will not be a typical biblical drama about Christ’s resurrection both, however somewhat a dialog about salvation and mankind on a philosophical and religious degree. It could want the runtime to deal with these topics in depth, which may clarify the need for 2 motion pictures.

In a separate interview, Gibson revealed that he deliberate on bringing again Caviezel as Jesus utilizing de-aging know-how, which has been utilized in motion pictures like Tom Hanks’s Right here and Harrison Ford’s The Dial of Future. Whereas the know-how has obtained blended opinions prior to now and does not at all times yield a optimistic reception, judging from all the things we have heard thus far, The Resurrection of Christ, anticipated to reach in 2026, nonetheless feels like a really thrilling title. However, the cut up film plan solely raises extra intrigue about what Gibson has in retailer for the sequel.