Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is staking out his spot as a populist defender of Medicaid in opposition to the steep cuts contained within the Home-passed megabill to fund President Trump’s home agenda. 

The senior senator from Missouri — who because the state’s lawyer common as soon as signed on to a lawsuit in search of to overturn the Inexpensive Care Act — has made his place clear: He won’t help a invoice that cuts Medicaid advantages. 

Hawley has lengthy warned his social gathering in opposition to Medicaid cuts; the $800 billion query is whether or not different senators will be part of him. 

He joined with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) throughout a marathon collection of votes on the price range decision in April to introduce an modification that may have stripped the Home’s directive to search out $880 billion in financial savings. The modification was not adopted, however Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) additionally voted for it.  

Earlier this month, Hawley wrote in a New York Occasions op-ed that slashing well being take care of the working poor “is both morally wrong and politically suicidal.” 

“Republicans need to open their eyes: Our voters support social insurance programs,” Hawley wrote. “More than that, our voters depend on those programs.” 

Hawley is adamant that Republicans take President Trump critically when he says they need to not contact Medicaid advantages and as a substitute deal with “waste, fraud and abuse.”  

“We ought to just do what the president says,” Hawley mentioned late final week, after the Home handed its model of the invoice.  

He cited issues concerning the affect the Home invoice’s Medicaid provisions — most notably a freeze on supplier taxes — would have on rural hospitals.  

Missouri well being specialists mentioned about 10 rural hospitals closed within the years main as much as the enlargement vote. Ever since, there haven’t been any closures.  

Hawley additionally mentioned he spoke with Trump, who reiterated his need for Congress to not reduce Medicaid advantages.  

“His exact words were ‘don’t touch it, Josh.’ I said hey, we’re on the same page,” Hawley instructed reporters.  

In a CNN interview earlier this month, Hawley referred to as a provision requiring elevated beneficiary co-pays “basically a hidden tax on working poor people who are trying to get healthcare.” 

Exterior observers mentioned Hawley hasn’t all of the sudden change into a defender of ObamaCare, however his Medicaid place displays the altering politics of the low-income well being care program. Decrease-income, working-class folks on Medicaid are actually a serious a part of the GOP base, which has change into extra populist for the reason that emergence of Trump. 

Missouri is a ruby-red state that Trump gained handily in 2024, however these voters additionally overwhelmingly handed a poll measure in 2020 to broaden Medicaid.  

“All the research shows that there are more people in rural areas on Medicaid than in urban areas. And I think [Hawley’s] picked up on that. … These are his voters, and he seems to be speaking out of a populist position,” mentioned Timothy McBride, a well being economist and professor at Washington College’s Faculty of Public Well being.  

The laws that handed the Home late final week would reduce almost $800 billion from Medicaid by a mixture of provisions that embody work necessities on “able-bodied adults” by age 64 with out dependents, a freeze on supplier taxes, extra frequent checks of individuals’s eligibility, and lowering federal Medicaid funds to states that present well being care protection for migrants with out authorized standing. 

Congressional scorekeepers estimated the invoice would end in near 10 million folks dropping insurance coverage protection.

The laws doesn’t make particular adjustments to the federal matching fee for Medicaid enlargement, as hard-liners pushed for, however it’s nonetheless designed to penalize enlargement states.  

There are 1.3 million folks receiving Medicaid advantages in Missouri, together with 350,000 folks lined by Medicaid enlargement.  

Leighton Ku, a professor and director of the Middle for Well being Coverage Analysis at George Washington College’s Milken Institute Faculty of Public Well being, estimated the state would lose about $2.4 billion in federal funding over a decade. 

Except the state repeals its enlargement, which may’t be executed with out one other poll measure, Missouri might want to discover another approach to pay for that protection. 

“So that’s going to create hardship for Missouri, because … Missouri is otherwise a pretty red state, so they don’t like doing things like raising taxes,” Ku mentioned, that means they’d possible have to chop different advantages. “This is one of the things that is causing Senator Hawley some concerns.” 

However specialists and advocates mentioned they continue to be perplexed by Hawley’s help for work necessities.  

Hawley and different GOP lawmakers argue the work necessities don’t qualify as a reduce to advantages. They are saying work necessities will make the “able-bodied” people who select to not work contribute to society.  

However specialists say virtually all beneficiaries are already working.  

“The people who are typically affected [by work requirements] are not young guys playing Xbox. It tends to be middle-aged and older women,” mentioned Ku. “Paperwork gets in the way.”  

The nonpartisan Congressional Funds Workplace estimated that the work necessities would save the federal authorities $280 billion over six years, at the price of thousands and thousands of individuals dropping insurance coverage.  

“I think that it’s great that he is sticking up for Medicaid, that he’s voicing concerns that are important to his constituents,” Christi Lero, a Medicaid ambassador for the left-leaning Missouri Rural Disaster Middle, mentioned. “But what’s also important is the method to go about protecting Medicaid. These job requirements are really just a different avenue to cut Medicaid. And we know that.” 

However as within the Home, there are competing factions within the Senate calling for even steeper cuts to Medicaid. It’s not clear how management will attempt to fulfill all camps. The Home’s laws front-loads a lot of the financial savings to fulfill the conservatives. 

Scaling again Medicaid cuts would additionally upset the fragile steadiness that received the invoice throughout the end line within the Home. Conservatives are already warning that they gained’t swallow an erosion of their hard-fought, deficit-cutting victories.  

Al Weaver contributed to this story.