Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) is asking on the Senate to remove a provision that may ban state regulation of synthetic intelligence (AI) from President Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” arguing it violates states’ rights.
“Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,” Greene wrote Tuesday in a put up on the social platform X. “I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.”
“We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous,” the Georgia Republican added.
Greene stated she won’t vote for the invoice when it comes again to the Home for last approval except the availability is eradicated, complicating the maths for Home GOP leaders.
Within the razor-thin Home GOP majority, Republicans can at the moment solely afford to lose three votes on any party-line measure. Two Republicans voted towards the invoice when it handed the Home final month: Reps. Thomas Massie (Ky.) and Warren Davidson (Ohio).
“We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power,” she stated. “Not the other way around. Especially with rapidly developing AI that even the experts warn they have no idea what it may be capable of.”
Greene’s opposition comes because the Senate prepares to sort out Trump’s sweeping tax and spending invoice, which handed the Home late final month.
The laws, formally titled the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts and boosts funding for border and protection priorities, whereas chopping spending on packages reminiscent of meals help and Medicaid.
The proposal requires a 10-year moratorium on state legal guidelines regulating AI fashions, methods or automated determination methods. This contains enforcement of present and future legal guidelines on the state stage.
Proponents of the moratorium consider a patchwork of state legal guidelines will be complicated or burdensome to know-how firms to innovate in a number of components of the nation.
A number of Home Republicans supported the measure, although some emphasised the necessity for a federal framework to preempt state legal guidelines.
Varied Democrats and a number of other tech watchdog teams are involved a federal framework might take too lengthy and jeopardize the security of AI methods.
Earlier Tuesday, a bunch of 260 state lawmakers wrote to Home and Senate members to sound the alarm over the AI provision, arguing it might “undermine ongoing work in the states” over the affect of the rising know-how.
Some senators are additionally warning the availability could not go the Byrd Rule, a procedural rule prohibiting “extraneous matters” from being included in reconciliation packages. This contains provisions that don’t “change outlays or revenues.”
The measure was included in a bit ordering the Commerce Division to allocate funds to “modernize and secure federal information technology systems through the deployment of commercial artificial intelligence.”
The Senate parliamentarian will decide whether or not the moratorium violates the Byrd Rule.
