The johns accused of shopping for intercourse from a high-end prostitution ring must be punished if discovered responsible, however what about those that are cleared?
Ought to the convicted be held accountable? After all.
However the place will they go to get their names and reputations and households again if they’re by no means charged with a criminal offense?
These are key questions after the Supreme Judicial Courtroom agreed that the present trigger hearings for the alleged 28 shoppers of the brothel community must be held in public to keep away from the trace of favoritism.
The court docket dominated that the considerations of favoritism outweighed considerations for the lads’s privateness.
The high-profile case smacks of a publicity seize by U.S. Legal professional Joshua Levy, who couldn’t prosecute the lads in federal court docket however as a substitute had their instances moved to the state courts.
He tantalizes the general public and bloodthirsty media by saying the accused contains the wealthy and highly effective and public officers however then walks away to go away the instances within the palms of a clerk Justice of the Peace. And lets the media salivate over opening the instances to the general public.
Attorneys for the alleged intercourse shoppers cited the media hysteria across the Karen Learn case – crammed with “vigilante ‘journalist’ bloggers” – to argue that the hearings must be closed.
“If this Court allows the Clerk-Magistrate’s order (opening the hearings) to stand, it is onto this apocalyptic media hellscape that the accused – before any formal adjudication – will be pitched,” an lawyer for one of many alleged intercourse patrons wrote in a quick filed with the SJC.
The excessive court docket didn’t purchase that argument.
Let’s be clear: what these males are accused of – enriching a intercourse trafficking ring — just isn’t okay. Nobody desires to see ladies exploited.
However do you actually belief the federal authorities?
Everybody concerned, together with the media and public, ought to take a deep breath earlier than participating in finger-pointing and scolding. The media ought to use warning and equity in protecting the instances.
Ha. Extremely unlikely.
It’s clear that lives might be ruined on this case, in some cases and not using a responsible verdict. These accused males might be carrying the scarlet letter if their names are made public, regardless in the event that they’re by no means convicted.
Do you actually belief the mainstream media to make sure equity to the accused? After the biased manner they simply coated the presidential marketing campaign?
If a few of these males are by no means charged, it is going to be too late. The media might be there protecting their each transfer and gained’t maintain again rendering judgment.
There are sure to be leaks even earlier than the hearings.
Everybody desires to see folks held accountable, and in case you’re a politician or wealthy you shouldn’t be above the regulation
However you’re additionally entitled to equity and never have your life utterly destroyed for one thing you’re not even convicted of.
Vigilante justice shouldn’t prevail.
