On Tuesday, a bipartisan group of legislators in Sacramento launched a letter urging California’s congressional delegation to guard the embattled Head Begin program and reject any proposed Trump administration cuts.
The letter, which was signed by over three-quarters of state lawmakers, stated they’re “deeply alarmed” by a rising listing of cuts to the federal early childhood program underneath the Trump administration — together with the specter of whole elimination — and requested that Congress “reject any proposals that weaken or eliminate Head Start.”
“That is probably the most bipartisan letter and issue that we have worked on in years, and it is all to protect and save our Head Start program,” Assemblymember Patrick Ahrens (D-Silicon Valley), stated at a press convention.
Head Begin additionally enjoys overwhelming public help throughout the political spectrum with 74% of Trump voters in help of this system, based on an April survey of greater than 1,000 registered voters nationwide. The ballot by the agency UpONE Insights was carried out on behalf of First 5 Years Fund, which lobbies Congress on early childhood training.
California receives $1.5 billion yearly for Head Begin. This system gives baby care, training, medical care, and nutritious meals to greater than 80,000 low-income youngsters from beginning via age 5 within the state and employs about 26,000 staff.
As a consequence of current cuts and threats, practically 1000 Head Begin staff in California have already obtained pink slips, Ahrens stated.
Have interaction with our community-funded journalism as we delve into baby care, transitional kindergarten, well being and different points affecting youngsters from beginning via age 5.
Two of the members who spoke on the convention — Ahrens and Republican Assemblymember Heather Hadwick (R-Alturas) — had attended Head Begin packages themselves. “I still distinctly remember eating fresh fruit for the first time in my life, because the Head Start Program offers free breakfast,” Ahrens stated.
In rural districts, like Modoc, Siskiyou, and Lassen Counties, “Head Start isn’t just one option among many. A lot of times, it’s the only option,” stated Hadwick, who represents these areas. “I fully believe that we need to cut our budget and cut the waste. I just hope that we don’t do it on the backs of low-income, working families and our children.”
“Access to reliable early education supports parents to work or pursue training, and early childhood jobs —many held by women of color — support community well-being and economic mobility,” the legislators wrote within the letter. Already, a scarcity of kid care entry “is estimated to cost California “$17 billion in lost productivity and economic output” yearly, they wrote, and cuts to Head Begin would “exacerbate this loss.”
Final month, an early model of President Trump’s funds proposed eliminating the Head Begin program totally. That proposal appeared to have been withdrawn within the “skinny” Presidential funds plan launched final week, however the administration has undercut this system repeatedly.
In January, an govt order to briefly freeze all federal monetary help in January left Head Begin workers abruptly unable to entry the funds they’d been promised. In February scores of federal staffers have been laid off on the division of Well being and Human Providers’ Workplace of Head Begin in Washington, D.C. And in April, the administration introduced that 5 of the 12 regional places of work managing relationships with Head Begin grantees can be closed instantly and all staff laid off, together with Area 9, which covers 4 states, together with California.
This text is a part of The Occasions’ early childhood training initiative, specializing in the educational and improvement of California youngsters from beginning to age 5. For extra details about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to latimes.com/earlyed.
