Eric Jackson realizes lots of people aren’t taking him significantly for the time being.
However he’s very severe about his $100-million lawsuit in opposition to the NFL over the “severe emotional distress and trauma” he says he suffered when former Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders unexpectedly dropped to the fifth spherical of final month’s draft.
“I was a consumer of the NFL product,” Jackson stated Friday in a telephone interview. “And I am protected under U.S. law as a consumer.”
Jackson, a 55-year-old resident of Lawrenceville, Ga., who runs his personal logistics firm, is a giant NFL fan who attends video games and has bought NFL Sunday Ticket to observe video games on TV. He additionally is a big fan of the Buffaloes and of Sanders, who was thought of by some to be a possible first spherical choose however was bypassed till the Cleveland Browns claimed him at No. 144 total.
Jackson stated Sanders’ drop within the draft “personally affected” him.
“I was triggered,” he stated. “I have some previous conditions that were triggered. Anger. I was frustrated. I was emotionally disturbed given the fact that you had a guy that was projected to go first round and it was someone that you kind of associate yourself with — like I said [in the lawsuit], I attended some of the games of Colorado, I watched every game on television and I consume their media daily. And that would establish my personal connection to the team and to the players on the team.
“And to see how they were personally [treated during] the draft process … it was just debilitating to the point to where I had to address it in one of my therapy sessions following the draft.”
Lawrenceville, Ga., resident Eric Jackson attends Tremendous Bowl LIII on Feb. 3, 2019, at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta.
(Courtesy of Eric Jackson)
Jackson stated the expertise gave him a “feeling of helplessness,” till he realized he may truly be capable to do one thing about it.
In a civil lawsuit filed Might 1 within the U.S. District Court docket for the Northern District of Georgia, Jackson alleged the NFL had violated the Sherman Antitrust Act for collusion and probably violated the Civil Rights Act for race discrimination, in addition to client safety legal guidelines for “misrepresenting the nature of the drafting process and the qualifications of players.”
Jackson filed as a John Doe however revealed his identification in courtroom paperwork by indicating he represents himself. Whereas he has no formal authorized background, Jackson stated he’s acquainted with the regulation by “self-study” and represented himself beforehand.
Final week, USC professor of regulation Clare Pastore instructed The Instances that the lawsuit is “ridiculous” and characterised the $100 million in damages it’s searching for as “absurd.”
“A supposed harm someone suffers in combination with some vast number of other people is not something that, that one person has standing to contest,” she stated.
Jackson stated Pastore and others who’ve reacted equally are lacking the purpose.
“A person sees that headline, ‘A Shedeur Sanders fan is filing a lawsuit,’ and it automatically goes to a frivolous category because you cannot sue on behalf of someone else,” Jackson stated. “But my cause of action is not as a fan. My cause of action is against the NFL as a consumer of their product, and they colluded to prevent an individual from being drafted. I mean, it’s a novel interpretation of the law, but it would apply.”
He added in a textual content message: “Regarding the potential for a race discrimination claim, while I acknowledge the complexities involved, I believe that the principle of disparate impact can provide a viable legal theory. The systemic issues within the NFL regarding race and opportunity cannot be overlooked, and I am confident that we can present evidence to support our claims. The historical context and ongoing disparities in the league are critical to understanding the broader implications of this case.”
Jackson selected the quantity of $100 million “because that’s what the law allows,” he stated, but when a choose or jury determines “that the request for reward is too high, then they will adjust it to, I guess, compensate the amount of harm that was done.”
That sum may appear laughable to some, however Jackson insists he’s not kidding round.
“This is not an intentional joke,” Jackson stated. “This is not a way of getting attention [for myself]. … It’s to get the NFL’s attention and let them know that they’ve been operating in this manner for years. Shedeur is not the first person this has happened to. They have a history of doing this to players.”
